The adjectives correspond in terms of sex and number with the nouns they change into French. As with verbs, chords are sometimes displayed only in spelling, as forms written with different modes of concordance are sometimes pronounced in the same way (z.B pretty, pretty); Although, in many cases, the final consonan is pronounced in female forms, but mute in male forms (z.B. small vs. small). Most plural forms end in -s, but this consonant is pronounced only in contexts of connection, and these are determinants that help to understand whether it is the singular or the plural. In some cases, the entries of the verbs correspond to the subject or object. Modern English doesn`t have much correspondence, although it`s there. Here are some specific cases for the subject agreement verb in English: the agreement is a phenomenon in the natural language, in which the form of a word or morpheme covariate with the form of another word or phrase in the sentence. For example, in the English phrase John goes Fido every morning, the shape of the “walks” is conditioned by the characteristics of the theme, “John”. This can be replaced by “John” by an element with different relevant characteristics, as in We go fido every morning, leading to a change in the form of “walks” to “walks” (or, alternatively, a change from “-s” to an empty morpheme, . The agreement is perhaps the morphosytic phenomenon that arises, because it is the morphological expression of a relationship that most researchers consider a syntactic relationship (although not without dissent; see morphological approaches). In contemporary linguistics, the term agreement is (unfortunately) used to refer alternately to the phenomenon itself and to the hypothetical grammatical mechanism that results. Unless otherwise stated, the term is used here only in the neutral and descriptive theoretical sense.
Another point of terminology variability concerns the identity of the grammatical elements that conclude an agreement. Canonically, the term is used to describe the morphological covariance between certain verbal elements in a clause (typically carrying the Tense/Aspect/Morphology) and a nominal argument in the same clause; but the term has also been used to describe many other matings of kovarying elements (for example. B nominates and its adjective modifiers, nouns and their owners, pre/post positions and their supplements, etc.; and more recently, the effects of the tension sequence, pronouns and their precursors, and even the relationship between several negative elements in a single clause; see the re-enrollment agreement as another explanation). Agreements are widespread in all linguistic areas; At the same time, the languages of the world can vary considerably in the amount of concordance morphology they present. At one end of the scale, a language like Mandarin has no canonical arrangement to be talked about; While languages such as Abkhazia, Basque, Icelandic and other robust forms of concordance between verbs and their arguments, their nouns and their modifiers, etc.